Guy Benson, December 6, 2018
The Supremes didn't determine that Trump has any sort of special right to build the wall, mind you; they simply declined to re-consider a lower court ruling that the administration could move forward with construction, assuming the project is authorized and funded by Congress. Whether that's a sound assumption is a separate issue. Chalk this upas a limited victory for the president and a blow to leftist environmentalists -- via Reuters:
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rebuffed a challenge by three conservation groups to the authority of President Donald Trump’s administration to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, a victory for Trump who has made the wall a centerpiece of his hardline immigration policies...The justices declined to hear the groups’ appeal of a ruling by a federal judge in California rejecting their claims that the administration had pursued border wall projects without complying with applicable environmental laws. The groups are the Center for Biological Diversity, the Animal Legal Defense Fund and Defenders of Wildlife. Their lawsuits said construction operations would harm plants, rare wildlife habitats, threatened coastal birds like the snowy plover and California gnatcatcher, and other species such as fairy shrimp and the Quino checkerspot butterfly.
Not 30 minutes after a group of border-state House Democrats accused Chuck Schumer of betraying them on President Donald Trump’s wall, the Senate minority leader picked up the phone to protest. Retract your statement, Schumer urged Rep. Henry Cuellar last Thursday...“I said, ‘No, I’m not going to withdraw the letter because we don’t want you weakening House negotiations for Democrats,” Cuellar recounted of his conversation with Schumer. House and Senate Democrats are now openly sniping at each other over Trump's border wall, a division that could weaken their hand in critical spending talks over the coming days...But while some Senate Democrats are open to funding at least part of Trump's request, newly emboldened House Democrats want to hold the line and refuse to provide even a penny. Indeed, House Democrats and outside liberal groups fret that Schumer — and the broader Senate Democratic conference — are going to sell them out on the wall.
From Trump critic but solid conservative columnist George Will's latest:
Unanimity is elusive in today’s America, but the Supreme Court achieved it. Although the dusky gopher frog is endangered, so are property rights and accountable governance. Both would have been further jeopardized if the frog’s partisans in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) had gotten away with designating 1,544 privately owned Louisiana acres as a “critical habitat” for the 3-inch amphibian, which lives only in Mississippi and could not live in the Louisiana acres as they are now. The eight justices (the case was argued before Brett M. Kavanaugh joined the court) rejected both the government’s justification for its designation and the government’s argument that its action should have received judicial deference, not judicial review...The 8-to-0 ruling was doubly beneficial. It was a recuperative moment for the court. And it was a chastisement of the administrative state, the government’s fourth branch, which is one too many.
Matt Vespa, December 6, 2018
The View’s co-host Joy Behar is still furious at Meghan McCain for ruining her swipe at President Trump. The panel was memorializing the passing of the late President George H.W. Bush, who passed away last weekend at the age of 94. Behar tried to use the death of the former president to attack Trump, specifically on the environment; Bush 41 signed the Clean Air Act into law during his administration. Behar was trying to take a swipe at Trump for allegedly undoing this law, but McCain ran a blitz, interrupting Behar and suggesting they focus solely on the late president. Behar was not having any of it (via RCP):
“He signed into law the Clean Air Act amendment of 1990, one of the most sweeping environmental statutes ever. This president that we have now is trying to unravel everything that he did, and Obama did. And if I ever become a one-issue voter, it will be about pollution and the greenhouse effect and the fact that --.”
That is as far as Behar got with her point, because fellow co-host Meghan McCain wasn’t having it.
“Can we focus on the president, please? I don’t want to talk about Trump,” McCain said, interrupting Behar.
“I’m not interested in your ‘one issue voter’ when we’re honoring a great president who passed.”
Co-host Whoopi Goldberg announced that they were cutting to a commercial, but you can see McCain and Behar still going at each other as the camera panned out. Now, Behar is reportedly threatening to leave the show, saying that McCain was an “entitled b*tch” who needs to get under control (via Mediaite):
On Monday, we posted about a fiery clash on The View between Joy Behar and Meghan McCain which — even by the show’s normal standard for heated debate — could only be considered intense. According to a report, the real fireworks began after the show went to break — leading one of the hosts to threaten to quit.
The Daily Mail claims that Joy Behar continued to fume as the show cut to commercial on Monday, and said she would leave the show if “this sh*t doesn’t stop.”
“I can’t take this much more,” Behar reportedly said.
Behar took aim at McCain — whom she reportedly called an “entitled b*tch.”
“Get this b*tch under control!” Behar reportedly said. She added, “I’ve tolerated a lot of sh*t on this show but I’m at my wits’ end with this entitled b*tch.